Related Posts


  1. Blackbear701

    As if I need another reason to love Vermont, my second home. Way to go!

  2. Cletus

    It could be a good tax revenue, but even if it isn’t, not having to spend millions of tax payer dollars to prosecute something so minor would be worth it. Not sure what Jose thinks he means by saying Obama would vote “present.” Obama doesn’t vote on such matters. He only signs it into law or vetoes it. He can add his 2 cents worth even though his opinion means nothing.

  3. crystal

    It’s time for a change.. drinking is way worse. Let’s go forward on this!!

  4. Jose

    We already know that Obama is prepared to vote “present” in order to signal the federal response.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2016 The Vermont Standard, All rights reserved | Group6 Interactive